脑源性神经营养因子在妇科肿瘤与子宫内膜异位症中的作用:诊断与疾病监测的候选生物标志物
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor in gynecological cancers and endometriosis: A candidate biomarker for diagnosis and disease monitoring
摘要
本文为叙述性综述,检索 PubMed/MEDLINE、Scopus 与 Web of Science 自建库至 2025 年 6 月的文献,系统梳理脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)及其 TrkB 信号在妇科肿瘤(卵巢、宫颈、子宫内膜癌)与子宫内膜异位症中的作用。机制上,BDNF 经 PI3K/Akt、MAPK/ERK、PLCγ 通路参与上皮–间质转化、失巢凋亡抵抗、转移与治疗耐药;在内异症中,循环与组织 BDNF 升高与神经血管生成、盆腔痛、病灶严重度及炎症重塑相关。作者认为 BDNF 作为微创标志物的潜力主要见于内异症,肿瘤证据多为组织表达研究;循环 BDNF 与疾病存在、严重度及治疗反应的关联在各项研究间异质性大,临床效用尚未确立,需标准化检测与前瞻性独立队列验证。
原文摘要
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a member of the neurotrophin family, has functions beyond neuronal survival and synaptic plasticity, including the regulation of cellular proliferation, migration, angiogenesis, inflammation, and nociceptive signaling. Growing evidence suggests that abnormal BDNF expression and dysregulated BDNF/TrkB signaling may contribute to the development and progression of gynecological malignancies, including ovarian, cervical, and endometrial cancers, as well as endometriosis. In cancer, BDNF has been associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition, anoikis resistance, metastatic spread, and therapeutic resistance through PI3K/Akt, MAPK/ERK, and PLCγ signaling. In endometriosis, increased circulating and tissue BDNF has been associated with neuroangiogenesis, pelvic pain, lesion severity, and inflammatory remodeling. Emerging clinical and translational evidence suggests that BDNF may have potential as a minimally invasive biomarker, mainly in endometriosis, whereas clinical data in gynecological cancers come largely from tissue expression studies; however, associations between circulating BDNF levels and disease presence, severity, or treatment response remain heterogeneous across studies. The review is based on searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science from database inception to June 2025. This review critically synthesizes the molecular mechanisms underlying BDNF dysregulation and its interactions with hormonal, immune, and epigenetic pathways, while evaluating its potential clinical utility for diagnosis and disease monitoring. Particular emphasis is placed on methodological limitations, contradictory findings, and factors that may contribute to variability among studies. Key knowledge gaps and future research priorities, including standardized measurement approaches, prospective investigations, and independent cohort validation, are also discussed. Overall, current evidence supports further investigation of BDNF as a candidate biomarker, but its diagnostic and disease-monitoring utility has not been established and requires prospective clinical validation.
推荐理由:对 BDNF/TrkB 在子宫内膜异位症与妇科肿瘤中的机制与标志物证据做了较全面的批判性整合,并明确指出方法学异质性与验证缺口;但属综述、无原始数据,与辅助生殖核心流程关联较远,可作为内异症相关植入与疼痛研究的背景参考。
文献解读
尚未生成。