{"id":328,"title":"From PCOS to PMOS: do we really need an 'ovarian syndrome'?","title_zh":"从PCOS到PMOS：我们真的需要“卵巢综合征”吗？","url":"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42965373","doi":"10.1002/uog.70360","pmid":"42965373","journal":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol","kind":"paper","lang":"en","published_at":"2026-10-31T00:00:00+00:00","fetched_at":"2026-11-08T03:44:05+00:00","authors":["Martins WP"],"primary_topic":"oocyte","topics":[{"slug":"oocyte","score":3.0,"hits":["ovarian"]},{"slug":"repro-endo","score":3.0,"hits":["pcos"]}],"topic_score":3.0,"preference_score":0.0,"preference_labels":[],"llm_score":60.0,"final_score":64.0,"score_dims":{"novelty":62,"rigor":25,"impact":58,"relevance":88,"translation":45},"recommend_reason":"可浏览：适合关注PCOS命名、诊断边界与概念演变的读者；但无摘要与原始数据，属观点性讨论，证据强度和直接转化有限。","keywords":["PCOS","PMOS","命名与诊断","卵巢综合征","生殖内分泌"],"selected":1,"story_id":247,"llm_provider":"deepseek","llm_model":"deepseek-flash","llm_effort":"low","source_key":"pubmed-endo-genetics","source_name":"PubMed · 生殖内分泌/遗传/保存","source_tier":1,"mention_count":1,"has_interpretation":false,"journal_key":"uog","journal_tier":"field-top","journal_if":6.1,"is_mock":false,"summary_zh":"该文为《Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol》刊出的观点/评论类文章，题为“从PCOS到PMOS：我们真的需要‘卵巢综合征’吗？”，围绕多囊卵巢综合征（PCOS）的命名与疾病框架展开讨论，质疑以“卵巢综合征”概括这一异质性状态是否恰当，并探讨改用PMOS等表述的可能。原文未提供摘要，具体论证、证据与结论无法核实，宜按观点性材料阅读。","summary":"","interpretation_basis":null,"fulltext_status":null,"interpretation":null,"fulltext":{"available":false,"status":null,"reason":"尚未抓取全文（未入选、分数未达阈值，或还没跑 fulltext 步骤）","pmcid":null,"license":null,"chars":0,"source":null,"fetched_at":null}}